[Matias]

Add-On

I reroll reset Matias during the wild hunt and it appears there is maybe anti-reroll check if you are kidnapped? So in addition to the above questions

1. When I escape after 10 weeks, after attempting to reroll reset, will I suddenly have to unbank this karma?
2. When I escape after 10 weeks, does the karma invested in raising my RPXP cap get refunded?

,________________________________________________________________________________,
| Credit Hours: 2272 Super |
| 200 [X] |
| Name: Matias Alejandro Sex: Male Concept Tier: One |
| Age: 28 ,———————-, |
| Apparent: 31 Archetype | Faeborn | |
| Born: March 25th, 1997 Modifier | Hunt Escapee | |
| ‘———————-‘ |
| Moral Tier: 1.0 Favor: xxx Invitation: 3 |
| Borough: Redstone Acedia: 0 |
| |
| |
| Fatigue: 0 Life Force: 100% Defenses: 25 / 25 |
| Wounds: You aren’t wounded. |
| |
| Unconscious [ ] Helpless [ ] Experience |
| Whoinvis [ ] Whereinvis [X] Available Spent / Cap |
| ,——————————–, |
| Bound [ ] Blindfolded [ ] Combat | 540149 | 0 / 1000000 | |
| Gagged [ ] Mute [ ] Roleplay | 558821 | 0 / 1188300 | |
| ,————————————-, |——————————–| |
| | Karma: 773(+2) Personal: 24280 | |
| | Spent: 54232 Banked: 0 | |
| ‘————————————-‘

[Matias]

Just google Duskholm MUD, its literally the first result.

[Matias]

If RG were as mentally unwell as they are demonstrating here they would most likely be in a non-optional mental health facility or completely homeless. They are obviously a troll who is 1 bored players afternoon away from being reported to some local police departments cybercrime unit for death threats.

[Matias]

The peanut gallery wants to know. Can you write a rough timeline of Haven the golden ages, the terrible periods, and all the hidden drama between. Who are these 19 people? Why were 8 of them on a call? How did you video conference them and know their IPs? The world needs to know.

[Matias]

PS – Now might be time for the rise of the infamous fleshformed cat people that were discussed at the end of the last iteration.

[Matias]

I would point out that Seraphina created a student union shop with multiple relevant rooms consolidated into 1 location across the street from the campus and is probably the best we are going to get for hotspots and we have encouraged students to use it. It even has uniforms.

[Matias]

@Miles

I never used the term risk in my posts, I think you are mixing my and Valkuk up or any of the other people that used that term?

[Matias]

Since you are still posting!

1. I totally should have suggested. Wake them up and see if they have any last words or they try and bribe you for their life. I did not think of it at the time, my bad.

2. I am sorry you got no RP killed but unfortunately I was not in a position to ensure you were RPed with so my advice was well if no one wants to interrogate them.

3. I agree if Guests are not default on the should be killed or have a strong reason to kill than it was very bad break of etiquette. I shall ATS.

But yeah I apologize for my part in it. I laid out all the thinking at the time. I agree RP is always the ideal. I agree wake them up and poke them with a stick is a minimum that is easy, should have suggested it.

[Matias]

I think its pretty clear where the uncertainty is but to walk through again.

In the mists combat happened. The Guest character attacked a PC and dealt damage to them. I think when we say soandso attacked we can assume it was not just that a fight had started but they actively dealt damage. So ambush in the mist. Considered a fairly aggressive act probably a higher threat than ambushing someone outside the mists.

The Guest character lost. The Guest character was a known 63rd Legion. The character that won the fight confirmed their identity and discussed options with characters online. (Hi again). Given a mist ambush and a known Legion character the discussion was basically. Well Legion are trying to bring Hell to earth. They are extreme threats in boroughs the Legion controls. We have one. Do we A) interrogate them and kill them. B) Kill them. (note it is my understanding their purpose is to pose a significant obvious threat which justifies killing similar to that of monsters). Advice swings towards well we are probably going to kill them because they are obviously evil and foolishly attacked someone who could handle them. Do we want to interrogate them and subtextually do they want to be put through interrogation with little to no chance of surviving. I guessed not.

Lop of their head. Proceed with the day. Another one bites a dust Lieutenants be warned.

Was it ideal. Nope I said as much above. Was it wrong. I do not think so based on my understanding of the purpose of T4 Guests that are actively working for hell with powers that far exceed other T4s.

Could I be totally wrong and I am a dick for the advice I gave. Sure! I accept that and normally I would have been in the camp of let do some token RP but that just not how the chips fell.

So the questions from the above series of events.

1. Are Guest characters that have an obvious reason to kill them: Monsters / Legion need any reason beyond we caught you to justify killing them? Ideally with RP which I agree is best practice.

2. Warnings of if you kill Guests they are just going to kill you kind of miss the point of Guest character as a tool for players to create content. They are not regular characters. They are free every 2 months (it seems) and so I would say the bar to any extreme action against them is lower than a regular PC and they owe regular PCs content because that is why they exist right?

3. Lets assume there was 1-3 hours of interrogation with a 99.9% chance of killing the Guest character. Would that have been better? If it was better would it be acceptable? If not acceptable, why not?

4. Looks like I may have misread this because it is in the Lieutenants helpfile which made me believe it happens because Lieutenants exist but help lieutenants final paragraph. I see now re-reading it that it could just be them saying Lts exist in raids forever regardless of whether a Guest Lieutenant exists. Maybe ATS but I think I probably misread it.

[Matias]

Well the question here is…

If you encounter 63rd LT is their purpose on grid to be an antagonist and killed?

If yes, then killing them at some point is a presumption.

Obviously the killer consulted other people (Hi I am one of them) and we determined that attacking someone in the mists was a fairly aggressive act.

So you have a 63rd LT whose very existence causes Legion raids to have Lt npcs that make them difficult and who is sworn to bring Hell to earth and thus threatens all factions and societies. Then on top of this they attacked someone in the mists which is again was interpreted as a fairly aggressive act.

Now if 63rd Lieutenants are not presumed to be kill targets than this is a very different conversation. My understanding is that like Monster Guests, Legion Guests are kill targets.

[Matias]

So just to be clear. You would have been fine with potentially 1 to 3 hours of RP with the knowledge that you were almost certainly going to be killed at the end of it? You just wanted to be interrogated and have some slim chance of talking your way out of death?

[Matias]

As someone who gave input on the outcome. Given the Lt attacked someone in the mists. We had them. It is like okay well we are probably 100% killing this person. Is there any form of interrogation RP that is not just pumping them for information and cutting off their head. I did not really see it and took a guess that an enemy guest probably did not want a prolonged scene where they were just treated as information dump and then merc’d.

Definitely knowledge they were a 63rd Lieutenant factored -heavily- into the murder of the character without subsequent RP. Had it been a regular PC. I probably would not have advised as I did.

I have kind of fiddled with the idea of 63rd Legion people being like nabbed and then venetian oathed to leave for X amount of time but that is functionally killing them too so I did not recommend we try something like that this time.

Sorry. I do believe Guests have a much lower threshold to death though because obviously monsters / LTs are in a position where the moral / pragmatic justification to kill them is readily apparent and in some cases a necessity.

[Matias]

My suggestion to ‘improve’ the current method of Invitation Gain.

1. Invitation can only be generated while a T3+ has Acedia.
2. Invitation is generated at 3x or 5x or 10x the Acedia value the T3+ has.
3. Invitation is prioritized towards people who are engaging in more complex/intimate RP with a T3+

Example

Bob has an Acedia value of 0.2 which shows as Acedia 0
Bob is RPing with June asking for a clue related to a plot (not victimizing) and so generates Invitation at a rate of 5x Acedia = 1.0
Bob then RPs with Larry and victimizes them still with a value of 0.2 Acedia so 1.0 Invitation
LLM processes and summarizes these 2 interactions determining the victimization RP is more significant and assigned the Invitation to Larry.

[Matias]

I believe the game does it to cause drama. Fabled are entertainment. The fable having the desire to fuck other people is the whole… like show! Will they, won’t they the real life trope!

[Matias]

I think we need some more information.

1. Are you experiencing invitation increases with T3s you have a coded relationship with?
2. Are you in private mode with the T3?
3. Do you codedly share a property with a T3?

I could see the code / Nova looking at things like that going this is the personal/inviting relationship stuff that would cause gains. Whereas I do not have a relationship codedly with any T3 and I RP with two semi-regularly but only in passing like plots/classes/etc and not sexy time. So I look at people who are having big increases and thinking maybe these are major factors?

[Author]

Posts